The most frequently assigned codes to learning descriptions (36%) were for patient education and counseling.Conclusion. Representatives of student organizations characterized their members’ participation in cocurricular activities as opportunities for learning. The results from the content analysis aligned with the quantitative data collected. Cocurricular activities provide opportunities for Doctor of Pharmacy students to enhance their skills, knowledge, and attitudes in both pharmacy practice and personal areas that map to ACPE Standards 2016 and the college’s own curricular outcomes.Objective. To define essential skills for Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) graduates that are needed in the four most common sectors of pharmacy practice as determined by expert faculty who instruct within pharmacy skills laboratories.Methods. A three-round Delphi method was used to establish consensus. In the first round, participants were asked what skills were needed by students at entry to practice in community, health-system, ambulatory care, and managed care pharmacy settings. In rounds two and three, participants were asked to rate each skill with a level of importance using a 10-point Likert scale (1=not important to 10=very important).Results. In round one, participants produced a collective list of 289 essential skills. These skill statements were sent to participants in rounds two and three to assign a level of importance. After the third round, participants reached consensus using a mean level of importance for a final list of 69 community pharmacy skills, 47 health-system, 60 ambulatory care, and 15 managed care skills. These skills were then mapped to entrustable professional activities domains for schools and colleges pharmacy to use as a resource when assessing core competency development in the curriculum.Conclusion. The Delphi technique was used successfully with expert pharmacy skills laboratory faculty to identify laboratory-focused essential skills that recent PharmD graduates should have prior to entering community, health-system, ambulatory care, or managed care pharmacy practice. These essential skills can be used to guide curriculum development, develop milestone markers, and help ensure students are practice ready.Objective. To evaluate the metacognitive abilities of pharmacy students and determine whether introducing the concept along with team-based learning (TBL) enhances metacognition.Methods. Pharmacy students completed a Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) and a low-stakes pretest during the first class that evaluated students’ knowledge about the therapeutic concepts that would be taught through TBL. The same questions were administered on the comprehensive final examination for the course. For each of the course assessments, students were asked to indicate their understanding of the topic and predict their performance. Actual performance was measured as a result of each assessment.Results. The pre-MAI composite score was 77.3%. Scores significantly improved by the end of the course to 84.6%. There were significant differences in both declarative knowledge and conditional knowledge when evaluating performance groups. Students in the middle performance group demonstrated the greatest ability to predict their performance on the final examination. Iadademstat solubility dmso Though these were not significant, students in the low group overestimated their performance, while students in the high group underestimated their performance. Baseline grade point average was the only factor predictive of the final examination score and the final course grade.Conclusion. Pedagogies such as TBL may support development of metacognitive skills in pharmacy students. However, intentional guidance provided by an instructor is required to improve pharmacy students’ regulation of cognition skills.Regardless of a faculty member’s career stage, effective mentoring is critical for successful professional development and a thriving academic career. Traditional mentor-mentee relationships can be effective but may present challenges for some faculty depending on their individual needs and institutional resources. The use of peer mentoring circles, where group members serve as both mentor and mentee, may provide additional resources and benefits to faculty at all career stages and appear especially beneficial for women faculty because of their focus on interconnectedness and collaboration. However, literature is scarce regarding effective mentoring strategies for women pharmacy faculty. As members of one women faculty-only peer mentoring circle, we describe our experiences using this mentoring strategy and offer recommendations for other faculty members considering this approach.The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted almost every facet of modern life, causing almost a million deaths worldwide as well as widespread economic and social strife. While contemplating how we might emerge from this pandemic, we were reminded of the Stockdale paradox. We suggest that the Academy must not only confront the brutal facts of the current situation, but we must also maintain faith in the endgame and a commitment to prevail despite the enormous challenges we face. The Academy can play a key role in helping the world recover from this pandemic if we build on the diversity and strengths of our programs nationally and globally. We suggest that there are three key actions that pharmacists and pharmacy educators must take to show leadership in this time of need. First, we must be the voice that reassures the public about the value of science and the scientific method. Second, we must work locally and nationally to ensure an optimal public health response. Finally, members of the Academy must serve as role models with respect to the essential public health tools to prevent the spread of COVID-19. By remaining positive, keeping the endgame in mind, and confronting the most brutal facts of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are confident that pharmacy education and pharmacy will weather this storm and arise even stronger for it.Objective. To further refine and examine the validity of an instrument for assessing pharmacy students’ self-efficacy in implementing the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process (PPCP) components.Methods. An instrument was developed and pilot tested in spring 2018 at one college of pharmacy. In spring 2019, a modified version of the instrument, the PPCP Self-Efficacy Scale (PPCP-SES), was administered to third professional year (P3) pharmacy students at seven institutions. Self-efficacy items were based on Bandura’s theory of self-efficacy, and students were asked to rate each item on a continuous scale (0-100). Data analyses included descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).Results. Three hundred P3 students completed the PPCP-SES. The domain-specific Cronbach alpha coefficients were collect, α=.89; assess, α=.92; plan, α=.95; implement, α=.96; and follow-up, α=.95. Based on the factor analysis results, three items were removed. Model fit statistics indicated the overall instrument had moderate goodness of fit.