<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Recash test site | Guthrie Robbins | Activity</title>
	<link>https://recash.wpsoul.net/members/tiesong6/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://recash.wpsoul.net/members/tiesong6/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Guthrie Robbins.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 09:03:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf19ef96c3e377ef6dae6d2823c82825</guid>
				<title>Guthrie Robbins posted an update: For N-glycopeptides, HCD and sceHCD generate similar numbers [&#133;]</title>
				<link>https://recash.wpsoul.net/activity/p/49438/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:30:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For N-glycopeptides, HCD and sceHCD generate similar numbers of identifications, although sceHCD generally provides higher quality spectra. Both significantly outperform EThcD methods in terms of identifications, indicating that ETD-based methods are not required for routine N-glycoproteomics even if they can generate higher quality spectra.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-49438"><a href="https://recash.wpsoul.net/activity/p/49438/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfe7a26ae411141283bf124aff674880</guid>
				<title>Guthrie Robbins became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://recash.wpsoul.net/activity/p/49318/</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 11:19:09 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>